ⅳ when static true=> experiment can trustable

ページ名:ⅳ

    ⅳ     when static true=> experiment can trustable

 

    🐇if we admit🐼

 

         [1] true  theory must certificate with True theory

         [2] Tie of certifications of Theory

 

          [1] & [2]  =  static information, in experiment, should be true, to prove physical equations

 

    🐇if we admit🐼

        [1] each info have trustivity,  what can reveal with percentage
        [2] we sometimes gather several info, to certificate event E

 

        [1] & [2] = trustivity of event E, may multiple of two trustivity, info A & info C

 

 

    🐇 what are trustable static ?

 

        [1] easy to confrim experiment

        [2] easy to confirm logics

        [3] easy to read text, in the certification

    🐇    trustivity of static, in our environment

        [1] when tech grows, its hard, to check information

        [2] when there are fake news, our predict power increase.

        [3] when easy to read text appears, tech will grows

    🐇how we evaluate trustivity of particular info ?

        [1] possibility calculation,  information A true or not, ( with some ways )

        [2] with the possibility calculation, trustivity evaluation become possible

    🐇 then, how we calculate possibility of 1 event happens ?

                   

            [1] with relating keyword ratio

            [2] with type of info

            [3] with simulators, if predict similler situation

            [4] with classification of static info

            [5] with predict non visible info 

 

    🐇 practice: evaluation of trustivity, with 3 information in static

        [1]    evaluation of trustivity of info A

                (1) if info C & info E looks true,

                (2) if info C & info E match with information A,

                     information A may trustable

                   ( if Possibility ( C = true & A = true )  is high, info A may trustable    )

 

        [2]    evaluation of trustivity of info C, E

                (1) if information A is trustable,

                      {1} if info C match with info A, 

                           info C may trustable

                      {2} if info E match with info A, 

                           info E may trustable

 

  🐇 what we should careful;

        (1) our static info, made with only informations, which easy to view  

 

        [1] we only take static, in visible place

        [2] we only provide static, in public space ( at usual ) 

        [1] & [2] = statics we uses, sometimes far from real value.

 

  🐇 what we should careful;

        (2) if pull power of our consciousness exist,

              famous info in static, we concentrate, will gather us

 

            [1] if we concentrate to average,                 we may gather at average

            [2] if we concentrate to super good player, we may gather to his play style

                 famous player in sports, usually

                {1} take static from scientists {2} clone play style by others {3} other player sometimes survay to compete with

 

            [1] & [2] => to concentrate to good player, may more better to you

 

  🐇 what we should careful;

        (3) we should re check statics

                [1] hacking measurement

                [2] sometimes, we take wrong static, in experiment.

                [3] lets check static, in real experiment.

 

  🐇 conclusion:

            we should sustain static trustable, to sustain trustivity of experiments

 

    ⅳ =  ♰  save

    12 reasons, why we can observe object ?

 

  source:

 

Rudolf Julius Emmanuel Clausius Nicolas Léonard Sadi Carnot Sir Issac Newton Sir Kelvin Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Boyle's law  Charles's law  Avogadro's law  Gay-Lussac's law Ludwig Eduard Boltzmann
        writer

 

シェアボタン: このページをSNSに投稿するのに便利です。

コメント

返信元返信をやめる

※ 悪質なユーザーの書き込みは制限します。

最新を表示する

NG表示方式

NGID一覧