ⅳ when static true=> experiment can trustable
🐇if we admit🐼
[1] true theory must certificate with True theory
[2] Tie of certifications of Theory
[1] & [2] = static information, in experiment, should be true, to prove physical equations
🐇if we admit🐼
[1] each info have trustivity, what can reveal with percentage
[2] we sometimes gather several info, to certificate event E
[1] & [2] = trustivity of event E, may multiple of two trustivity, info A & info C
🐇 what are trustable static ?
[1] easy to confrim experiment
[2] easy to confirm logics
[3] easy to read text, in the certification
🐇 trustivity of static, in our environment
[1] when tech grows, its hard, to check information
[2] when there are fake news, our predict power increase.
[3] when easy to read text appears, tech will grows
🐇how we evaluate trustivity of particular info ?
[1] possibility calculation, information A true or not, ( with some ways )
[2] with the possibility calculation, trustivity evaluation become possible
🐇 then, how we calculate possibility of 1 event happens ?
[1] with relating keyword ratio
[2] with type of info
[3] with simulators, if predict similler situation
[4] with classification of static info
[5] with predict non visible info
🐇 practice: evaluation of trustivity, with 3 information in static
[1] evaluation of trustivity of info A
(1) if info C & info E looks true,
(2) if info C & info E match with information A,
information A may trustable
( if Possibility ( C = true & A = true ) is high, info A may trustable )
[2] evaluation of trustivity of info C, E
(1) if information A is trustable,
{1} if info C match with info A,
info C may trustable
{2} if info E match with info A,
info E may trustable
🐇 what we should careful;
(1) our static info, made with only informations, which easy to view
[1] we only take static, in visible place
[2] we only provide static, in public space ( at usual )
[1] & [2] = statics we uses, sometimes far from real value.
🐇 what we should careful;
(2) if pull power of our consciousness exist,
famous info in static, we concentrate, will gather us
[1] if we concentrate to average, we may gather at average
[2] if we concentrate to super good player, we may gather to his play style
famous player in sports, usually
{1} take static from scientists {2} clone play style by others {3} other player sometimes survay to compete with
[1] & [2] => to concentrate to good player, may more better to you
🐇 what we should careful;
(3) we should re check statics
[1] hacking measurement
[2] sometimes, we take wrong static, in experiment.
[3] lets check static, in real experiment.
🐇 conclusion:
we should sustain static trustable, to sustain trustivity of experiments
ⅳ = ♰ save
12 reasons, why we can observe object ?
source:
Rudolf Julius Emmanuel Clausius | Nicolas Léonard Sadi Carnot | Sir Issac Newton | Sir Kelvin | Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz |
Boyle's law | Charles's law | Avogadro's law | Gay-Lussac's law | Ludwig Eduard Boltzmann |
writer |
コメント
最新を表示する
NG表示方式
NGID一覧